Small-brained hominid species challenges human exceptionalism, says paleoanthropologist | 24CA News
Quirks and Quarks18:53Unearthing a small-brained hominid species that challenges human exceptionalism
In 2013 famend paleoanthropologist Lee Berger despatched a few cave explorers right into a cave system in South Africa to see what they may discover. Little did he know they’d return with pictures of fossilised hominid stays that may upend all the pieces we thought we knew about what makes us particular. He and his colleagues found a completely new species of historic human family members, referred to as Homo naledi, that lived a couple of hundred thousand years in the past — nearly when our species, Homo sapiens, first appeared. Bob speaks with Berger about his new guide: ‘Cave of Bones: A real story of discovery, journey and human origins.’
The 2013 discovery of the biggest assortment of hominid fossils ever discovered is rewriting the origin of advanced behaviours we thought had been uniquely human, says a famend paleoanthropologist.
The fossilized bones belonged to a completely new species of historic human family members referred to as, Homo naledi, which lived in South Africa a number of hundred thousand years in the past when the primary Homo sapiens arrived on the scene.
Paleoanthropologist and National Geographic explorer-in-residence Lee Berger spoke with Quirks & Quarks host Bob McDonald about this unbelievable discover that he detailed in his newest guide, Cave of Bones: A real story of discovery, journey and human origins. Here is a part of their dialog.
Describe the Rising Star cave system the place you discovered these bones. What’s it like?
It’s not your typical cave. These are networks of extremely tiny and tight passages, virtually labyrinth-like, that reach from the floor right down to 40 or 50 metres earlier than they hit the water desk. It’s four-and-a-half kilometres of cave system and it is interrupted periodically by small to medium-sized chambers. And it is in these chambers, typically a whole bunch of metres again from the place we are able to entry these caves, that we’re discovering these stays of Homo naledi.
These are non-human, small-brained, historic human family members that look like burying their useless very intentionally in a ritual-like vogue again in these deep chambers all through the system.
How did you discover the fossils?
So the fossils had been discovered by chance, intentionally, and that is not an oxymoron. I had despatched out newbie cavers to make use of a map I had created virtually a decade earlier than in my seek for historic hominids that led to discovery of one other species referred to as Australopithecus sediba. And they went into this cave system as a part of that exploration train, however on an evening in September of 2013, they went off the map.

They discovered a factor we now name “the chute labyrinth,” an extremely slim — right down to 17-and-a-half centimetres — 12-metre vertical passage that enters this distant cave system. There they noticed bones, did not know what they had been, introduced me these pictures, and I instantly acknowledged that they had discovered one thing extraordinary. No scientist had ever seen pictures like this earlier than.
Well, what stood out to you while you first noticed these bones?
Oh, I immediately knew they had been primitive. That is, the dentition was not formed like a human. It had bigger premolars and the molar proportions had been totally different than ours. This appeared like one thing actually historic, however they had been simply mendacity on the ground of this actually distant chamber.
That led to the invention of the biggest assemblage of historic human family members ever found in historical past that we controversially mentioned, after we introduced in 2015, had been intentionally disposing of the useless. And why that was controversial is they are not people. They have the mind the dimensions of a chimpanzee.
The stays had been in holes within the floor that had been dug; they’d been positioned there after which buried with the filth from these holes.
You may clearly name that “a grave.” We did not acknowledge it as a result of we form of talked ourselves out of that being attainable with one thing that wasn’t human: that is the burial of the useless.
So the place then do H. naledi match into the human evolutionary tree?
We don’t know. I do know that is a horrible reply from a scientist, however H. naledi seems to be prefer it ought to belong with species like Homo habilis, among the very earliest members of our genus, a really primitive Homo erectus. And that may have sometimes positioned them at about two, two-and-a-half-million years.
What was immensely shocking about H. naledi is that after we finally acquired good dates, each instantly on the fossils and on the location, they turned out to be from round 230 to 330,000 years in the past. That’s throughout the vary of time that we thought solely fashionable people existed in Africa.
So till that second, we thought we had been alone. And now we have dropped one other species, very not like us, in some ways, proper into the center of that crucial time interval.
Wow. So they had been round similtaneously early Homo sapiens, our species?
That’s proper. And I believe that was the very first thing that was most shocking to everybody. And then in fact as we continued the analysis, and continued to check each the fossils themselves, however extra importantly, the state of affairs they had been in.
These discoveries started difficult our concepts of when crucial occasions like burial of the useless, ritualized behaviours and the creation of issues like maybe meaning-making symbols that some folks may name “art” occurred. Although we’re very cautious to not say that. They problem the [human] origin tales that we thought we had all found out.
Well, inform me extra concerning the proof that you simply discovered within the cave that you simply suppose they intentionally buried their useless.
So again in 2015 after we introduced this new species, we needed to clarify why solely the stays of Homo naledi had been in these deep, deep underground methods. And so very controversially, we mentioned at the moment we believed that they had been ritually disposing of the useless.
We had been very cautious to not use the phrase “burial.” Burial implies a a lot, way more crucial kind of superior behaviour that almost all archaeologists would tie solely to large-brain fashionable people.
Then in 2018, we discovered these holes dug into the bottom with our bodies flexed in them in a fetal place deep in these methods. And we started to appreciate that these had been what you’ll name “human graves.” That was astounding.
That led to quite a lot of analysis round describing these varied graves as we discovered them in several areas all through the system. Then July of 2022, that is once I really entered the system and acknowledged that there have been engravings and meaning-making symbols carved into the partitions above these graves.

The [engravings] have been carried out a number of occasions over, maybe a whole bunch, if not, 1000’s of years, in a spot the place there is no proof that people have ever been.
Now that was staggering as a result of that begins to get into an concept that this non-human species is behaving like people. I believe what’s actually unbelievable, Bob, is that people aren’t doing that refined behaviour on the similar time.
Wow.
They will not do it for an additional 100 to 150,000 years.
Wow!
This predates us, however probably has nothing to do with these behaviours in us that we use immediately to determine ourselves.

So what does it say, then, about H. naledi’s psychological capacities in the event that they had been deliberately burying their useless, they had been creating what seems to be like artwork, or they had been scratching on the partitions anyway, and but that they had brains the dimensions of chimpanzees?
I believe it says, at first, that we people have created a form of mythology round ourselves. Almost each spiritual textual content begins with an origin story that tries to elucidate why we’re totally different and sometimes superior to animals.
What I believe we’re studying with H. naledi is that that is not a real story; that H. naledi was able to behaving in a method very almost, if not as advanced as we do immediately, doing it with a really small mind.
This Q&A has been edited for size and readability.
