Breaking down Lakers’ options as LeBron threat leaves NBA powerhouse at crossroads

Basketball
Published 02.08.2023
Breaking down Lakers’ options as LeBron threat leaves NBA powerhouse at crossroads

It was a commerce deadline that saved their season, even when the Los Angeles Lakers would find yourself being swept out of the championship race by the Denver Nuggets.

At the time although, even amid the Lakers being broadly celebrated as one of many greater winners on deadline day, LeBron James couldn’t disguise his preliminary disappointment.

Disappointment that the deadline had handed and the workforce had failed in its commerce bid for Kyrie Irving, who as an alternative went off to the Dallas Mavericks.

Who will win all of it? Watch each recreation of the NBA convention finals and Finals LIVE on ESPN on Kayo Sports. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >

“I can’t sit here and say I’m not disappointed on not being able to land such a talent, but [also] someone that I had great chemistry with, and know I got great chemistry with on the floor, that can help you win championships, in my mind, in my eyes,” James instructed ESPN on the time.

“But my focus is shifted now. My focus is shifted back to where it should be and that’s this club now and what we have in the locker room.”

What the Lakers had within the locker room was someway sufficient to take them to the Western Conference Finals, a shocking achievement given as of April 3 they got only a 0.2 per cent likelihood of creating the playoffs.

It could haven’t been the dream state of affairs James wished nevertheless it was sufficient to salvage what in any other case appeared like one more reminder of the workforce’s crippling weak spot — its lack of depth.

Now, the Lakers discover themselves at a crossroads and with two potential paths to go down.

Which path they take might very nicely be decided by how James’ feedback earlier this week are perceived.

LeBron James’ phrases carry weight. Harry How/Getty Images/AFPSource: AFP

In case you missed it, the Lakers famous person made it clear to ESPN reporter Dave McMenamin after the Game 4 loss to the Nuggets that he was significantly contemplating retirement.

Unfortunately for Denver coach Michael Malone, meaning one other few days of headlines dominated by LeBron and the Lakers.

As former NBA participant J.J. Redick stated on ESPN’s ‘First Take’ on Wednesday, James is “one of the most calculated athletes in the history of professional sports”.

He doesn’t waste a phrase, or as Redick himself put it: “Everything he does is for a reason”. “And whether this is to put a little bit of pressure on the Lakers to improve the roster… whatever it is, there’s a reason he did this,” added Redick.

ESPN reporter Brian Windhorst stated he believes James was “essentially sending a message” to the Lakers by casting doubt over his quick taking part in future.

“There is something for the Lakers to consider here,” Windhorst stated in response.

“The Lakers have four or five weeks to consider the direction they are going with this team. They’ve got to make a decision about whether they want to hold this team together.”

That begins with answering one powerful query.

THE ‘TOUGH’ QUESTION LAKERS MUST ANSWER THIS SUMMER

Going again to these two paths the Lakers might go down, one is much riskier than the opposite. The ceiling is sky-high — however in a deceiving approach — and the ground is frighteningly low.

James’ feedback on Tuesday may very well be the beginning of him planting the seeds for an additional potential play at Irving — or every other third star alongside Anthony Davis.

But do the Lakers actually wish to danger repeating the identical mistake they made in buying and selling for Russell Westbrook, leaving the remainder of the supporting solid considerably weakened?

The Lakers have huge choices to make. Harry How/Getty Images/AFPSource: AFP

“That’s going to be the philosophical question for the Lakers,” The Ringer’s Kevin O’Connor stated on The Mismatch Podcast this week.

“Do we truly go all-in here, this coming offseason, on Kyrie or somebody else? Do we go all-in with some of these future assets around LeBron and around AD or do you maintain some of these picks and try to instil some youth in your team and maintain some long-term flexibility?

“That’s going to be the tough question for the Lakers because they’re looking further down the horizon for the Luka’s and the Giannis’ — that is their dream. Not giving up a first-round pick for a guy that has blown up every franchise he’s been a part of.”

Of course, it’s harsh accountable Irving for any of the issues in Dallas. That has extra to do with what the Mavericks gave as much as get him after dropping Jalen Brunson in free company.

So, you may blame the entrance workplace for that one. Outside of that although, O’Connor has some extent that Irving brings loads of crimson flags off the court docket too.

But if that’s what LeBron needs is that what LeBron will get, even when it means considerably sacrificing the workforce’s long-term imaginative and prescient within the course of?

Will the failed Russell Westbrook experiment affect the Lakers’ decision-making this summer time. (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)Source: Getty Images

“This is going to be the test,” The Ringer’s Chris Vernon stated on The Mismatch.

“This is going to be the, ‘Do we stand up against LeBron the GM?’. They did the last time when he went public, they finally stood up against him and they in turn created the best team around him. Not by getting the guys he wanted but by making the trades they wanted to make.

“He’s going to want Kyrie. He wants Kyrie and has said he wants Kyrie. We know LeBron the GM is not who you want to rock with but are they going to succumb to that or make the best decision for the franchise? That’s going to be a very interesting question this off-season.

“Pelinka did a very good job of throwing together a roster that was capable of winning and was a big winner of the trade deadline. But that wasn’t a LeBron operation. That wasn’t going out and getting his hand-picked guys he wanted and in fact, he was vocal about his disappointment in not getting Kyrie in the off-season.

“I think it’s all been this idea that will eventually take place. That’s going to be them squaring off. Are they going to do what he wants to do or what is for the best?”

WHY ‘HIGHLY UNLIKELY’ KYRIE MOVE MAY BE JUST A PIPE DREAM

Clearing up sufficient cap area to signal Irving goes to be an issue anyway. The Lakers actually gained’t have the ability to produce the $47 million ($A71.2m) most wage Irving might get elsewhere.

Instead, in accordance with ESPN’s entrance workplace insider Bobby Marks, the Lakers might create as much as $30.5 million ($A46.2m) by waiving Jarred Vanderbilt, Mo Bamba, not exercising Malik Beasley’s workforce possibility and renouncing free brokers D’Angelo Russell, Lonnie Walker IV and Rui Hachimura.

At most, L.A. might bump that out to $35 million ($53.0m) by buying and selling Max Christie and their first-round choose. But even nonetheless, that determine would fall nicely in need of $47 million ($A71.2m).

So, would Irving himself be keen to sacrifice anyplace between $12 ($A18.1m) and $17 million ($A25.8m) to play in Los Angeles? And would that be the correct method to assemble the roster anyway?

Kyrie Irving is a free agent this summer time. (Photo by Ron Jenkins/Getty Images)Source: Getty Images

“You can basically put all your eggs in the Kyrie Irving basket,” Marks stated on his offseason information for the Lakers.

“We’re just using him as the name because that’s going to be the name that’s going to be linked. You can create $30 million ($A45.5m) in room. You can do that… we’ve seen the downfall of what happens to your depth there.

“Would I do it for the playoffs? Certainly. Remember, you’ve got to play 82 games and when you have a roster of LeBron James, Anthony Davis and a player like Kyrie Irving who have not played more than 65 games in the last three seasons, good luck.

“You’ll be lucky just to get into the play-in again here. You’ll have a depth of all minimum players like we saw this past season.”

Then you add within the headache of the brand new collective bargaining settlement, which is able to make it tougher to construct round a famous person trio like James, Davis and Irving.

The league is doing that by introducing a second wage cap apron, which is $17.5 million ($A26.5m) over the tax line.

According to ESPN, “those teams will lose several key team building mechanisms, including the taxpayer mid-level exception, utilising cash in trades, moving first-round picks in drafts that are seven years away, signing free agent players in the buyout market and taking on more money than is being sent out in trades”.

It might be onerous to construct round Irving, James and Davis. Maddie Meyer/Getty Images/AFPSource: AFP

There are a whole lot of specifics to unpack as to how these modifications will affect big-spending groups within the NBA and ESPN produced an in-depth breakdown on simply that whether it is of additional curiosity.

Put within the easiest of phrases, it simply means it will likely be much more tough for the Lakers to retain the extent of depth that helped take them to the Western Conference Finals within the first place.

“People have to remember that there is a new collective bargaining agreement that is coming into place, starting July 1st, where it makes it extremely, extremely difficult to have three players earning $120 ($A181.8m) to $130 million ($A197.0m) and then to build around them, especially when you don’t have draft picks going forward,” Marks stated.

“I know they have the 17th and the 47th pick but they owe New Orleans a pick in 2024 and owe Utah a pick in 2027.”

It is but one more reason why Marks thinks it’s “highly unlikely” that Irving might be operating out within the purple and gold subsequent season.

OTHER STARS L.A. COULD TARGET… AND FREE AGENTS THEY MUST KEEP

Of course, Irving is just not the one huge identify the Lakers might goal, with ESPN’s Brian Windhorst floating free agent Fred VanVleet as yet one more sensible possibility.

“He could be an option for the Lakers and probably closer to that $30 million number,” Windhorst stated on his podcast this week.

“Fred VanVleet is now represented by Rich Paul… I don’t think Rich Paul is going to take him to L.A. for a discount but I think that has to be taken under advisement and there are other players they could be interested in.”

That apparently consists of Atlanta Hawks star Trae Young, in accordance with Jovan Buha of The Athletic.

Trae Young was floated in hypothetical commerce presents. Todd Kirkland/Getty Images/AFPSource: AFP

He reported on Wednesday that Lakers brass have had “internal discussions” about what a “hypothetical trade offer” for Young might appear to be this offseason.

Young is presently underneath contract via the 2026-27 season although and it’s unlikely the Lakers might make a transfer for him with out together with James or Davis in any commerce bundle.

Forget the star-chasing although for a second as a result of, as talked about earlier, that is one other path the Lakers might take — operating it again.

That might be tough within the sense that L.A. has 10 free brokers this summer time, headlined by mid-season acquisition Rui Hachimura and rising expertise Austin Reaves.

Lakers free brokers (R = restricted, T = workforce possibility)

Troy Brown Jr., D’Angelo Russell, Malik Beasley (T), Wenyen Gabriel, Rui Hachimura (R), Austin Reaves (R), Dennis Schroder, Tristan Thompson, Lonnie Walker IV and Scotty Pippen Jr. (R)

Multiple stories declare Hachimura and Reaves are the “priorities” for the Lakers.

In reality, NBA insider Marc Stein reported there’s “frankly no scenario” the place Reaves gained’t be on the workforce subsequent season.

“Even if a team or two out there does decide to put a higher offer on the table than the maximum four-year, $51 million ($A77.3m) deal that the Lakers can offer, all indications are that the Lakers will match whatever they must to keep the restricted free agent, who has emerged as L.A.’s top shot-creator not named LeBron James,” wrote Stein on his Substack.

There is a chance they may maintain each and in addition signal Irving however as Marks explains, it will require cooperation from not simply Dallas and Irving but additionally D’Angelo Russell.

So, it’s “highly unlikely” in accordance with the entrance workplace skilled.

“It would come out of the cooperation of the Dallas Mavericks who don’t have to cooperate with anything and it would basically come out of the cooperation of D’Angelo Russell, who would need to agree to a sign-and-trade,” Marks stated.

“Mo Bamba and Malik Beasley’s guarantees are before free agency starts. So unless you have a side deal with the Mavericks and Irving before everything starts, basically you have to have Russell agree to a sign-and-trade, Irving agrees to a sign-and-trade, whatever picks are coming out.

“It hard caps you, Irving basically comes at $30 million. Can you do a sign-and-trade? What is the goal for the Dallas Mavericks? To get the 17th pick and the 2029 Laker pick? To have now lost Jalen Brunson, Spencer Dinwiddie, Kyrie Irving and replaced him with D’Angelo Russell.

“That ain’t happening. So the likelihood of Kyrie Irving in a Los Angeles Lakers uniform is highly, highly, highly unlikely.

“What you’re likely going to see is the Lakers prioritise signing Austin Reaves and Rui Hachimura. That is priority one here for both those players.”

LAKERS GM REVEALS ‘HIGH PRIORITY’ FOR ROSTER MOVING FORWARD

Once that’s sorted, the Lakers can then flip their consideration in the direction of extension candidates — headlined by Davis, who’s eligible for a three-year, $167.5 million ($A253.8m) max extension beginning on August 4.

Although the five-year, $190 million ($A287.9m) max extension Davis signed again in 2020 included an early termination possibility previous to the fifth 12 months of the contract in 2024-25.

LeBron James and Anthony Davis. Harry How/Getty Images/AFPSource: AFP

Russell can be eligible for a two-year, $67.6 million extension earlier than June 30 whereas Malik Beasley and Jarred Vanderbilt are different notable extension candidates.

So, with all of that in thoughts, what’s the early indication from the Lakers’ entrance workplace as to which path they’ll go in? Well, GM Rob Pelinka appears intent on operating it again.

Speaking to reporters at his end-of-season media alternative on Wednesday, Pelinka burdened the necessity for roster “continuity” much like that which helped the Nuggets to the highest this season.

“After the trade deadline, we had one of the top records in the league. I think keeping that continuity is going to be very important,” Pelinka stated.

“We ultimately got knocked out by a team that has great continuity. That’s a high priority for us. We feel like we have a group of special players in the locker room. They enjoy playing with each other.

“Darvin [Ham] enjoys coaching them. We know there’s more growth and improvement in that group, especially if we get a training camp together. So, I would say it’s a high priority to keep our core players together.”

Whether that finally ends up taking place stays to be seen and if it’s price something, former Laker Kyle Kuzma actually appeared sceptical when reacting to the news on Twitter.