THE WEST BLOCK Episode 18, Season 13 – National | 24CA News
THE WEST BLOCK
Episode 18, Season 13
Sunday, January 14, 2024
Host: Eric Sorensen
Guests:
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations
Health Panel:
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, BC
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown
Location:
Ottawa Studio
Eric Sorensen: Increasing stress within the Middle East after a U.S. led coalition strikes Houthi targets in Yemen.
I’m Eric Sorensen, sitting in for Mercedes Stephenson. Welcome to The West Block.
The strikes are supposed to cease Houthi assaults on ships within the Red Sea, however might they escalate a wider regional battle? We converse to a former U.S. state division official in regards to the dangers because the White House grapples with the battle between Israel and Hamas.
Plus, emergency departments are overwhelmed once more this winter. With lengthy wait instances and never sufficient beds, a disaster is plaguing Canada’s well being care system and it’s getting worse. We converse to 2 docs with a roadmap for coverage makers.
And, remembering former NDP Leader Ed Broadbent.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau: “His service to this country was always focused on strengthening communities, on bringing people together.”
Eric Sorensen: Fears of escalation within the Middle East are rising after strikes by the U.S. and U.Okay. on Houthi targets in Yemen. The strikes supported by U.S. allies, together with Canada, are geared toward stopping Houthi assaults on transport vessels within the Red Sea. It comes at a fragile time for the White House, because the U.S. secretary of state simply wrapped up his newest go to to the area for talks on easy methods to finish the battle and what occurs to Gaza when it’s over.
Antony Blinken, U.S. Secretary of State—Cairo, Thursday: “We also had conversations about the day after the conflict ends, doing the work necessary to prepare for that, as well as for long-term, enduring security.”
Eric Sorensen: So, do the air strikes undermine the White House peace plan, or do they danger a wider battle within the Middle East?
Joining me now could be Frank Lowenstein, a former U.S. envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations.
Thank you once more, Mr. Lowenstein for being with us. The U.Okay. and the U.S. are combatants now within the area, with the assault on the Iranian sponsored Houthis. What are the dangers would you say now of a nonetheless wider battle?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Well so I feel that the danger of escalation in Yemen is comparatively restricted, that there’s solely a lot extra the Houthis can actually do past what they’ve been doing proper now. And we had an identical state of affairs in 2016 and we launched a reasonably severe assault on their navy targets and so they stood down after that. My guess is that they gained’t do this now, however I don’t see that as being a entrance that has quite a lot of potential to blow up. I feel the administration is rather more involved in regards to the Lebanon border and the potential for Hezbollah to be getting extra concerned in that battle. And then additionally the West Bank, which is in a really delicate state of affairs proper now, and I feel Blinken and people people are very involved that that entire state of affairs could collapse. So sure, it’s of concern, definitely, what’s happening in Yemen and we did actually the whole lot we might to keep away from it. But you will need to perceive that if the Houthis have been decided to get a response out of the United States and our allies, they have been going to have the ability to do this. So we tried as arduous as we might to keep away from it and now I feel the method is only one of containing it as a lot as we are able to.
Eric Sorensen: You know Antony Blinken’s diplomacy; he’s been to the area now 4 instances. What has it achieved? Like Israel isn’t curbing its assaults on Gaza. It isn’t backing away from being in Gaza, presumably controlling it for a really very long time.
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Right. Well one of many issues that I realized once I was within the state division was typically you get measured on the dangerous issues that didn’t occur, and I feel what the secretary would most likely say is that we’ve averted battle with Lebanon, with Hezbollah and Lebanon. We’ve stored the West Bank from disintegrating solely. So I feel he would view his efforts as being profitable on these core targets. That being stated, he’s in a really, very tough spot with respect to what the Arab world desires with a purpose to interact within the reconstruction of Gaza, and in the end within the case of Saudi Arabia, normalizing relations with Israel. And that could be a path to a two-state answer, and I feel he offered that to the Israelis yesterday with the Saudi potential for normalization being on the prime of the record and I feel he actually anticipated a extra ahead leaning response out of the Israelis. Their response was one thing alongside the road of look, we’re simply not prepared to speak about any of that stuff proper now, and it actually places Blinken and the U.S. in a really tough state of affairs as a result of we are able to’t transfer ahead with the following phases of this battle, getting Arab world concerned in a peacekeeping power and reconstruction in the event that they don’t see that path to a two-state answer, and proper now that’s mainly an unattainable job with regards to the Israelis.
Eric Sorensen: is there a major rift between Joe Biden and the White House and Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli authorities?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Well I wouldn’t say it’s vital, and it’s largely been behind the scenes proper now. I do know there have been some very powerful conversations with the Israelis that we have now been partaking in, you already know, exterior of the general public eye. And I feel what we’ve actually been targeted on there’s the humanitarian state of affairs in Gaza. I feel the navy marketing campaign; we want to see them interact in a way more focused strategy. I feel we’ve made that very clear. The Israelis should not doing that as a lot as we want, however they’ve made some progress in that route. Where we’re actually nowhere is on the humanitarian help. I imply as you all properly know, there’s 2 million folks in Gaza who don’t have meals and water and gasoline. Many of them are susceptible to famine and illness. So you could possibly be , you already know, casualties on a scale that will dwarf what we’ve seen to date within the navy battle, except Israel adjustments its place considerably with respect to permitting humanitarian help. And I feel on that entrance, one of many issues Blinken would actually have burdened is the potential for a two-week pause in return for the change of some hostages, and likewise the chance to provide the folks of Gaza, you already know, rather more humanitarian help than they’ve gotten proper now. So I feel that’s the primary focus for Blinken is on this kind of shorter time period what can we do to stop this case from actually spiralling uncontrolled on the bottom in Gaza, after which work in the direction of the following phases after we’ve gotten that carried out.
Eric Sorensen: It’s what makes me marvel if there isn’t extra of a rift that’s type of—that may simply widen rapidly right here as a result of, you already know, I imply President Biden all through his profession has been a staunch supporter of Israel, however might this battle at this second imperil Joe Biden and his political future at dwelling in an election yr?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: It’s a terrific query and there’s little doubt about it. It is having a detrimental impression on the president’s polling numbers. Again, they don’t appear to be too involved about that proper now. I feel there’s a protracted strategy to go between now and the election. But I feel over time, you will notice us taking an more and more powerful line. There’ll be an more and more apparent public rift between us and the Israelis with regards to this humanitarian state of affairs. I actually can’t stress that sufficient, how unbelievably harmful that’s and what an unattainable state of affairs quite a lot of completely harmless folks in Gaza have been put in. And on condition that we’re so invested on this battle, we’re by extension accountable for that catastrophe. So I feel we’re actually going to be pushing the Israelis on that as a lot as we are able to and hoping that they’re actually going to alter course, you already know, at a elementary manner on that entrance. Otherwise, you could possibly be a giant breach between the U.S. and Israelis, publicly.
Eric Sorensen: You now instantly after the Hamas assault in October you have been on this program with Mercedes Stephenson and also you stated there shall be a protracted and brutal battle, and right here we’re. Do you see from now at this level that it simply carries on or is there an finish to it?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Yeah, it’s going to hold on. I don’t assume there’s any query about that. The Israelis have stated that there’s months left on this marketing campaign. If you take a look at the place—by their very own account, they’ve killed possibly a 3rd to half of Hamas fighters. Their nonetheless very a lot dug in round Khan Younis in Southern Gaza and there—the Israelis are saying no person can return to Northern Gaza as a result of there’s nonetheless a, you already know, a big contingent of Hamas militants in tunnels and in any other case hiding there. So the navy marketing campaign is nowhere close to having achieved its targets, and so the Israelis haven’t any intention of backing down. I don’t assume this discuss of a day after is basically correct. I feel that there’s completely different phases that this marketing campaign goes to undergo. But any discuss of brining the Palestinian authority into Gaza or determining how governance goes to work there’s untimely as a result of we have now most likely three or 4 months at the least of pretty intensive navy combating there and at that time, you can begin occupied with what comes subsequent. But the Israelis have made clear this can be a marketing campaign that’s going to take a very long time and so they intend to be full occupiers of Gaza for so far as the attention can see. Not completely, however so long as it takes to attain their navy targets, which will be, you already know, months at greatest.
Eric Sorensen: So this renewed discuss of a two-state answer, is that one thing you could see the situations being bringing that about ultimately out of this battle or are we additional away from that than ever?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Well it’s a extremely good query. Right now, we’re additional away than that than ever. But there’s been a line of reasoning right here within the United States that this case needed to get lots worse earlier than it had any probability of actually getting higher. And so possibly there’s alternative that comes out of this. Maybe the Israelis will take a step again once they get carried out with this marketing campaign and ask themselves: is that this a sustainable manner for us to stay? And hopefully they’ll see the sunshine and say okay, we have now to do some issues completely different right here with a purpose to get Saudi normalization, with a purpose to get assist for reconstruction. In order to maintain the United States on facet, they’ve to alter course, however that’s going to take a special authorities. To be very clear about it, Prime Minister Netanyahu will do nothing to advance the two-state answer, proper? His coalition is to date to the correct; they’re nonetheless speaking about settling Gaza Strip and actually getting the Palestinians there out to different international locations. So their mentality there’s nowhere close to conducive to a two-state answer and I don’t assume that’s going to alter so long as Prime Minister Netanyahu is in energy.
Eric Sorensen: If it’s price trying that far forward, what do you see occurring the day after the battle is over? Who rebuilds? Who’s in cost?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: So I feel that actually relies upon lots on how the Israelis conduct the remainder of this navy marketing campaign. If you’re , you already know, tens of hundreds of extra casualties, extra doubtless because of illness and famine than straight, you already know, because of Israeli navy strikes, but when that’s the case, they might have burned so many bridges within the Middle East at that time that not one of the different international locations are keen to assist them with reconstruction. So I feel one of many issues Blinken has been stressing is hey, you’ve obtained to begin occupied with the following step now. Maybe it’s six months away or no matter, however in any occasion, you might want to begin behaving now in a manner that’s going to permit for some prospects for peace sooner or later and in any occasion, for the Arab world to come back in and supply tens of billions of {dollars} for reconstruction, which is totally obligatory. But yeah, proper now it appears to be like like we’ve taken a giant step again, however it might be potential with completely different management, actually on either side that this might open up alternatives down the street.
Eric Sorensen: We solely have just a few seconds left. Does Netanyahu survive out of this?
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Ah, I’ve realized by no means to depend out Prime Minister Netanyahu. He rises just like the phoenix over and over and over. His state of affairs is worse than it’s ever been and he’s actually beholding to an excessive proper wing coalition, which isn’t going to work with regards to, you already know, their long term targets in Gaza and our long term targets in Gaza. So I feel that is all going to come back to a head within the subsequent few months, whether or not or not it’s he makes it out of that or not is basically anybody’s guess.
Eric Sorensen: Mr. Lowenstein, actually good to speak to you. We at all times get heaps out of it. Thank you very a lot.
Frank Lowenstein, Former U.S. Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations: Thanks for having me.
Eric Sorensen: Up subsequent, lengthy wait instances and overwhelmed ERs. Why docs are calling for pressing motion to deal with the disaster in well being care.
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians: “Well the situations from coast to coast to coast, they’re horrific and inhumane. We have a large number of Canadians that are waiting in emergency departments with serious illnesses, up to 10, 12, 15—we even heard up to 32 hours in one emergency department in Canada.”
[Break]
Eric Sorensen: Once once more, emergency departments are overwhelmed with sufferers who’re ready many hours for care. Some of the causes are acquainted: not sufficient workers, not sufficient beds, and the surge that comes from lots of people getting sick this time of yr. What’s completely different this time? Well, ER docs say the state of affairs is the worst they’ve ever seen, and so they need actual motion to repair the disaster plaguing Canada’s well being care system.
For extra on this, we’re joined by Dr. Kathleen Ross. She’s a household doctor and the President of the Canadian Medical Association. And Dr. Trevor Jain, an ER physician with the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians.
So let me begin with you Dr. Jain. First of all, describe the state of affairs in your emergency room.
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: Well the conditions from coast to coast to coast, they’re horrific and inhumane. We have a lot of Canadians which might be ready in emergency departments with severe sicknesses, as much as 10, 12, 15—we even heard as much as 32 hours in a single emergency division in Canada. I imply the final 20 years, the emergency division’s turn out to be all issues for everyone for on a regular basis, as a result of we’re at all times open and the system’s beginning to mirror that disaster.
Eric Sorensen: Dr. Ross, you’re in B.C. You’re speaking to docs throughout the nation. Is what Dr. Jain describes remoted?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: Unfortunately this isn’t an remoted situation anymore and we’re seeing these challenges from coast to coast to coast, in city centres and rural centres. We actually have a disaster of entry on our arms now.
Eric Sorensen: What is the danger right here for Canada?
Eric Sorensen: Well and we have now, you already know, six million Canadians. We talked about this on this program a yr in the past and the state of affairs solely appears to have gotten worse. Six million Canadians can’t entry main care. Dr. Ross, why is that?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: So there’s clearly a mismatch between the variety of Canadians looking for main care and people of us offering main care. The time is now for us to have a look at exponentially growing workforce based mostly care so we are able to leverage the skillset of plenty of suppliers as a part of the workforce to enhance entry to the first care. These are the influx points once we take a look at our emergency division, overcrowding. If folks haven’t any entry to main care in the neighborhood, after all they’re going to show to the emergency room. As Dr. Jain has stated, the lights are at all times on. It’s at all times open. And the better situation I feel we have to take a look at for our overcrowding in emerge is how will we transfer folks out of emerge into these acute care beds, into long run care beds the place that’s applicable, exponentially growing entry to hospital at dwelling to try to offload therapies that we are able to offload. These are all areas that we are able to goal within the yr forward.
Eric Sorensen: Dr. Jain, I feel that’s the priority of ER docs is that there’s—that individuals are seeing it as an issue of too many individuals arriving at ER however describe the truth that it’s actually there’s a bottleneck that happens at ER.
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: Yeah, there’s this delusion that, you already know, that some planners and companies have socialized that affected person diversion, that’s telling sick folks to not come to the emergency division as a strategy to remedy emergency division overcrowding. Look, we all know these sufferers that present up with minor sicknesses or minor points, they don’t trigger emergency division overcrowding. It is an outflow drawback. It’s the admitted sufferers that we have now on stretchers that we can not transfer to hospital beds as a result of the hospitals are full. You know, you discuss to any emergency division, we are able to stand being busy. We don’t thoughts being busy, however overcrowding kills and that’s what we’re beginning to see.
Eric Sorensen: You know I need to type of get to this query instantly as a result of it’s simply hanging on the market. What is it—you already know, Dr. Ross I’ll begin with you and I’ll ask you each the identical query—what’s your message to the political leaders when we have now a state of affairs like this getting worse?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: We want to maneuver rapidly on the targets which have already been established. There are {dollars} on the desk from the federal authorities to provincial and territorial organizations that we are able to really begin to handle among the challenges we’re dealing with. We have to have a look at our staffing points. We want to coach extra physicians and nurses, and we have to retain extra physicians and nurses. And meaning ensuring that our workplaces are secure, safe and well-supported. And in the meanwhile with overcrowding, definitely the sufferers are ready lengthy instances. Certainly sufferers struggling, however these of us offering care are struggling as properly and that results in extra burnout and extra turnover.
Eric Sorensen: And I’ll stick with you for only a second. I requested you about that federal funding as a result of that was put in place, or at the least provided, virtually a yr in the past now. Only 4 provinces: B.C., Nova Scotia, P.E.I., Alberta have signed up. What’s holding it up for Ontario, Quebec and the others?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: That’s a terrific query, and I feel Canadians are actually shedding endurance with this problem. We know we’d like sustainable, long run plans for well being care, with completely clear and accountable measures on entry. And definitely entry to main care and entry to emergency rooms must be prime of that record. That’s the entrance door basis of our well being care system and we have to get shifting.
Eric Sorensen: Dr. Jain, what’s your main message to political leaders who watch a program like this?
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: Well what I might say is that this, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, we requested for a gathering with the ministers of well being throughout the nation and so they had a gathering in October, within the fall, in Charlottetown with all of the ministers of well being. And the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians is asking for a direct nationwide discussion board on the acute care disaster with premiers throughout the nation and with fellow stakeholders with a purpose to handle this situation. I feel that, you already know, to Dr. Ross’ level, Canadians have had sufficient. They’ve been extraordinarily affected person, however no matter their postal code, Canadians deserve well timed entry to acute care providers.
Eric Sorensen: Dr. Ross, I imply we have been used to seeing these sorts of political summits the place premiers and possibly the prime minister collect round a desk and the nation pays consideration. What in regards to the docs being available at a desk like that, the medical affiliation and the directors being on the desk like that, and people political leaders and having all of them discuss it in a manner that will have Canadians paying consideration?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: So I actually assume we’ve gotten excellent at naming the issue. We’ve recognized options. We haven’t been the best at implementing these options. I’ll add that I don’t imagine that anyone jurisdiction, nobody entity goes to have the ability to resolve this disaster. We should be collaborative. We must convey the voices of the entrance line and expertise along with these which might be writing the cheques and distributing the cash alongside these which might be administering the issue is simply too enormous for us to truly handle as people. And I assist Dr. Jain’s requires a nationwide discussion board.
Eric Sorensen: You know the CMA desires docs to be allowed to observe in different provinces with out extra bureaucratic licensing necessities. Dr. Jain, in Atlantic Canada you’re doing that. How is that working?
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: Well it’s a terrific program, and I’m grateful for the management of the CMA persevering with to maneuver the ball ahead on this. And what I might say is it gives some labour mobility and, you already know, from a regional plan, if there’s one a part of the area that’s desperately in want of well being care suppliers, it’s a pleasant strategy to improve that labour mobility. But going to what Dr. Ross has stated, except we improve our HR assets, these are coaching extra physicians, coaching extra nurses, constructing extra infrastructure to deal with our sufferers in all elements of their care, you already know, nationwide licensing is a constructive transfer however it’s just one a part of a many advanced answer that’s required.
Eric Sorensen: From your perspective, Dr. Ross, that mobility query, does that assist ultimately? And as soon as once more, the place are the opposite provinces on this?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: Yeah. So definitely, I applaud the Atlantic Provinces for shifting first on this space. We know that there’s 250 physicians which have signed on to that Pan-Atlantic Mobility Registry. It’s necessary for us to truly consider that, present the successes, present the areas the place physicians have been capable of present that important protection that’s wanted to make sure emergency rooms don’t shut, that there’s speciality providers out there the place they may not have been earlier than and supply these obligatory protection’s for rural, distant physicians to have the ability to take time away for instructional, private depart, medical depart for that matter, to have the ability to make that observe sustainable.
Eric Sorensen: So only a fast reply from every of you then, in 30 seconds. Dr. Jain, one yr from now, what adjustments would you wish to see that you could possibly pinpoint that you’d see a yr from now that isn’t right here proper now?
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: I want to see the premiers make this considered one of their primary priorities and meet with the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the CMA and different stakeholders to deal with the well being care disaster and specifically, from our lens, the acute care disaster and first care disaster with actionable steps. You know, we’ve stated it earlier than, you already know, we’ve named the issue. It’s time to maneuver on with actionable steps and options. So let’s roll up our sleeves. Let’s get collectively and let’s get the care that Canadians deserve.
Eric Sorensen: Dr. Ross, one yr from now, what do you need to see that’s completely different from what’s occurring proper now?
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: I’d wish to see a long run plan in place with clear and measureable targets that Canadians can look to and perceive the place their well being care {dollars} are being spent and the way we’re making progress.
Eric Sorensen: All proper. Dr. Ross, Dr. Jain, thanks a lot for speaking to us. It’s a giant drawback, however we’ve obtained to maintain cracking at it. Thank you.
Dr. Kathleen Ross, CMA President—Coquitlam, B.C.: Thank you very a lot.
Dr. Trevor Jain, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians—Charlottetown: Thanks very a lot.
Eric Sorensen: Up subsequent, remembering former NDP Leader Ed Broadbent and his impression on this nation.
Jagmeet Singh, NDP Leader: “We think about Ed’s legacy, he spent his entire life fighting for working class people. He grew up in the City of Oshawa, a very worker’s town, and that stayed with him in his whole career politically. Even after he retired politically, he continued to give back so he’s someone that is a passionate voice for working people and a fighter for a future where they’re not left behind.”
[Break]
Eric Sorensen: Now for our remaining one final thing …
The nation misplaced a political big this previous week: Ed Broadbent. Like Tommy Douglas and David Lewis earlier than him, Broadbent was a pioneer of recent social democracy on this nation, constructing the muse of the New Democratic Party that we all know immediately.
The institute that bears his identify known as Broadbent a champion for extraordinary Canadians. It’s the phrase extraordinary that stands proud. In a protracted profession in public life, Broadbent didn’t curry favour with the rich or the political energy brokers in Canadian life. He genuinely simply wished a greater life for all of us. And in politics, he believed that began with working collectively, even together with your political foes. Clash over coverage, not character and construct a greater nation.
On the Constitution, he labored with Pierre Trudeau and with Brian Mulroney. One of his nice regrets he stated was seeing the decline in civility in Parliament.
Ed Broadbent, Former NDP Leader: “There is a difference between personal remarks based on animosity and vigorous debate reflecting big differences of judgement. However we may differ, we’re all human and we all have the right to have our inner dignity respected—and especially in this House in debate. Thank you very much.”
Eric Sorensen: Politics has turn out to be extra disparaging. Broadbent yearned for extra decency, and never simply in Parliament. He stated all of us have the correct to our inside dignity. Ed Broadbent was a rare Canadian who cared about extraordinary Canadians.
That’s our present for immediately. Thanks for watching. We’ll see you subsequent week.
