Quebec judge blames police security plan in 2012 election-night shooting | 24CA News

The safety plan put collectively by police for Quebec’s 2012 election evening had a “major flaw” that permitted a gunman to hold out a lethal assault, a Superior Court decide has dominated in a civil case.

Justice Philippe Bélanger awarded a complete of practically $292,000 in damages to 4 stagehands who had been working at a downtown Montreal venue the place then-premier-elect Pauline Marois of the Parti Québécois was delivering a victory speech on Sept. 4, 2012.

As Marois was onstage, a gunman shot lifeless lighting technician Denis Blanchette on the rear of the venue and significantly injured a second technician, David Courage, who was struck with the identical bullet. The plaintiffs sued the Montreal police and Quebec provincial police for failing to correctly consider the dangers related to the occasion and for not deploying officers to protect the again of the venue.

“The court concludes that the SQ (provincial police) and the SPVM (Montreal police) did indeed commit a fault by not ensuring any police presence, nor security perimeter, behind the Métropolis,” the decide wrote in his ruling dated Nov. 30.

“Due to lack of communication and co-ordination in the deployment of their workforce, both (police forces) failed in their obligation to ensure the safety of the public … by carrying out a security plan that provided no police protection at the very location where the new premier of Quebec was to be evacuated following her speech.”

Richard Henry Bain was convicted in 2016 on one rely of second-degree homicide and three counts of tried homicide for the election evening taking pictures. He was sentenced to life in jail with out the potential of parole for 20 years. The 4 plaintiffs had testified they suffered from post-traumatic stress and different psychological harm because of the taking pictures. They had initially sued for a complete of greater than $600,000.

During the civil trial introduced by the stagehands, police witnesses testified that they’d thought Montreal police had been securing the surface of the venue on election evening. Provincial police had been stationed contained in the efficiency corridor.

However, the court docket was advised that the provincial police had solely made a basic request to safe the rear of the venue and that Montreal police assigned a single patrol automobile to observe the entire constructing. Most Montreal police sources had been deployed at a scholar protest a number of blocks away.

Provincial police testified that they’d decided there was no credible menace to the venue. The trial additionally heard at the least six threats had been made in opposition to Marois the day of the election, however none concerned Bain.

Officers advised the court docket that Bain’s actions had been unforeseeable and that the convicted gunman was appearing as a lone wolf. But the decide rejected that argument, noting that police have an obligation to handle basic dangers — not solely these associated to introduced threats or these which can be eminently predictable.

“It can be concluded that the absence of a police presence and a security perimeter behind the Métropolis was a major flaw in this security plan, of which Richard Henry Bain tragically took advantage,” Bélanger wrote. The venue has since been renamed to the MTELUS.

Bélanger mentioned the proof confirmed {that a} police presence behind the venue would have thrown off Bain’s plan. It took the shooter roughly 74 seconds to stroll from his car to the spot the place opened fireplace towards the plaintiffs.

“Put simply, there was a breach in the perimeter of security, the attacker took advantage of it and his victims were the first people blocking the path,” Bélanger mentioned.

The decide famous that regardless of the flaw within the safety plan, he discovered no cause to query the integrity, good religion and benevolence of the cops current within the train of their duties that night.

Virginie Dufresne-Lemire, lawyer for the plaintiffs — Jonathan Dubé, Guillaume Parisien, Audrey Dulong Bérubé and Gaël Ghiringelli — mentioned the 4 had been shocked with the ruling however joyful.

“The judge agreed with what we presented to him, that there was a fault that was committed, that our clients suffered intense trauma that were caused by this fault; so for our clients, this is a big victory,” she mentioned.

READ MORE: Court begins for witnesses suing police over Quebec’s 2012 election-night taking pictures

In an announcement, Quebec provincial police mentioned it has taken word of the judgment. Chief Insp. Patrice Cardinal mentioned the police pressure strives to repeatedly enhance its practices and has already adjusted its strategies, together with to raised co-ordinate with companions concerning safety planning and intelligence gathering for election campaigns.

“It should be noted that all these means have already been deployed during previous campaigns and that the 2014, 2018 and 2022 elections took place without incident,” Cardinal mentioned.

Montreal police mentioned in an announcement that vital modifications have been made since 2012, together with to centralize administration of vital safety occasions.

Neither police pressure wished to remark additional citing the potential of an attraction.

In Quebec City, Education Minister Bernard Drainville, a former PQ member who was on the downtown Montreal venue on election evening 2012, mentioned Friday that he and others current that evening have lengthy puzzled how the shooter was capable of get so near the Métropolis.

“I’m hoping that we will draw the lessons from what happened so that it never happens again,” Drainville mentioned. “Whatever party, whatever public gathering or political public gathering, these kinds of events cannot happen … we came very, very close to great, great tragedy and we were extremely lucky.”

&copy 2022 The Canadian Press