Emergencies Act inquiry report will weigh a key question – Was Trudeau justified? – National | 24CA News

Were final yr’s convoy protests a nationwide emergency that required unprecedented powers to deal with? Or did the Liberal authorities overreach with their resolution to invoke sweeping authorities to finish weeks of demonstrations?

Canadians can count on some readability on these questions from the unbiased inquiry into the federal authorities’s resolution to invoke the never-before-used Emergencies Act final February, as police and politicians struggled to reply to demonstrations in Ottawa and past.

Justice Paul Rouleau, who led the unbiased public inquiry into the so-called “Freedom Convoy” and the federal authorities’s emergency powers, is scheduled to launch his ultimate report Friday afternoon. The report is anticipated to be tabled within the House of Commons simply after midday japanese commonplace time.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took the unprecedented step to invoke the Emergencies Act – the successor to the controversial War Measures Act – on Feb. 14, 2022. By that point, the convoy protest in Ottawa was grinding into its third week, and like-minded protests had popped up at Canada-U.S. border crossings in Windsor, Ont., and Coutts, Alta.

Trudeau defended his resolution throughout his testimony on the fee, suggesting the scenario was “out of control” and had a “potential for violence.”

“What if the worst happened in those following days (after Feb. 14)? What if someone had gotten hurt?  What if a police officer had been put in the hospital?” Trudeau put to the fee.

“What if, when I had the opportunity to do something, I had waited and we had the unthinkable happen over the coming days, even though there was all this warning?”

3:22Trudeau defends invoking Emergencies Act to finish ‘Freedom Convoy’

Rouleau’s fee sought to reply three central questions: why the Liberal authorities invoked emergency powers, the circumstances main as much as that call, and if the sweeping measures have been each applicable and efficient in quelling final yr’s convoy protests.

But the proof introduced between Oct. 13 and Dec. 2 final yr included rather more: from dysfunction on the prime of the Ottawa Police Service, to the impression the convoy had on residents in numerous communities, to debates over whether or not the scenario introduced a legit nationwide safety menace.

Rouleau heard from most of the political and policing figures concerned in responding to the protests – though notably not Premier Doug Ford or members of his cupboard – together with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a number of senior federal cupboard ministers, municipal politicians and senior nationwide safety and regulation enforcement officers.

Several organizers of the convoy protests themselves supplied vibrant takes on the which means of the demonstrations and perceived federal overreach in shutting them down.

In all, the fee heard from 76 witnesses over 36 conferences and regarded 1000’s of paperwork that gave an unprecedented view into the political and policing posture towards the protests.

2:19Emergencies Act: what we discovered from the six-week-long inquiry

Those paperwork included unguarded textual content messages between senior cupboard officers – Justice Minister David Lametti calling former Ottawa Police Service Chief Peter Sloly “incompetent” in a message to a cupboard colleague, for example. They additionally included minutes from closed-door conferences at Ottawa City Hall, a surreptitious recording of Watson discussing the OPS with then-police board chair Diane Deans, and intelligence reviews from the Ontario Provincial Police documenting the convoy protests’ evolution.

Another central query anticipated to be addressed by Rouleau’s report is whether or not the convoy protests – whereas undoubtedly disruptive – rose to the extent of a nationwide safety menace.

Convoy organizers and the attorneys representing them repeatedly characterised the demonstrations as “peaceful” and “non-violent” – a characterization that was disputed by a number of witnesses representing Ottawa neighborhood teams.

2:43Emergencies Act inquiry: Mendicino testifies, convoy lawyer ejected from hearings

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland testified that the blockades of Canada-U.S. border crossings introduced a menace to Canadian financial pursuits with the nation’s largest buying and selling accomplice.

But the Emergencies Act has a transparent definition of safety threats that might warrant the usage of emergency powers, tied to the language used within the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act. Those threats embody espionage or sabotage of Canadian pursuits, critical violence motivated by ideological or non secular beliefs, or an tried overthrow of the Canadian authorities. Lawful protest and dissent are excluded from the definition.

CSIS Director David Vigneault instructed the fee that he didn’t consider the convoy protests constituted a nationwide safety menace beneath the CSIS Act, however that he however suggested Trudeau to invoke the Emergencies Act – suggesting he understood the Emergencies Act to have a “broader” definition of safety threats than these CSIS operates beneath.

That opinion just isn’t universally shared.

Carleton Prof. Leah West – a former Department of Justice lawyer who labored on nationwide safety recordsdata – identified that “unlawful and even violent protests” should not essentially nationwide safety threats beneath the regulation.

“Did we label the G8 and G20 protests in Toronto a national security or terrorist threat? … Similarly, we have never labelled blockades and other non-violent but illegal means of obstructing critical infrastructure as terrorism,” West testified.

With recordsdata from Rachel Gilmore and the Canadian Press.

&copy 2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.