N.S. paralegal alleges law firm fired her over pregnancy, missed time | 24CA News

A Board of Inquiry in Nova Scotia is investigating a human rights grievance from a girl who says she was fired on account of her being pregnant and the missed time that got here with it.

Jennifer Doucet began working as a paralegal for Farrow Law, in Upper Tantallon, N.S., in June 2018. In January 2019, she knowledgeable her employer she was pregnant.

She testified on the inquiry in Halifax on Monday that she had extra appointments than a typical being pregnant as she was high-risk on account of being older than 35. She testified the child “was measuring small, so that was the first red flag” in February.

Doucet typically labored by the lunch hour to make up for appointments, a course of which she says finally stopped when she was instructed trip time could be required.

High-risk and being pregnant termination

She stated she disclosed to her employer that there have been considerations in regards to the ultrasound. The child was recognized with Edwards’ syndrome, often known as Trisomy 18, a life-threatening genetic situation. She was going to have a process to terminate her being pregnant.

Then, Jacqueline Farrow, Doucet’s boss, advised a break from work could be warranted.

“She proceeded to tell me that I should take a month off of work,” Doucet testified.

“Initially, I didn’t think I was going to need that much time,” she instructed Global News in an interview. “I thought I would be OK and I didn’t even know what the date was going to be for the procedure (to terminate the pregnancy).”

Farrow instructed the inquiry Tuesday that Doucet had used all her trip time and sick time, and the one different possibility was to take day off — and finally be reimbursed by employment insurance coverage (EI).

“I could not afford to take a month off,” Doucet testified Monday, saying she was awaiting particulars of the process to terminate her being pregnant. That appointment was finally scheduled for April 23.

Farrow and Doucet agreed on her taking two weeks off starting in mid-April, Farrow testified Tuesday.

But after Doucet underwent the process, she developed two infections. Farrow bumped Doucet’s return-to-work till May 6.

However, on May 5, the day earlier than her return, Doucet emailed Farrow, saying she “felt mentally that I wasn’t prepared” as a result of she was “still dealing with the loss of my baby.”

Doucet defined that she was going to make one other physician’s appointment to get her depart prolonged.

“I never had the time that I needed to process and mourn the loss of my baby,” she stated in an interview.

But on the workplace, Farrow testified Tuesday that she was coping with considerations raised by two attorneys who didn’t have Doucet to assist them of their work.

“There’s a professional obligation that we have to our clients and it was a concern to me,” Farrow stated.

Fired from place

On May 6, Doucet woke as much as an e-mail saying she was fired.

“I was shocked,” Doucet testified.

The lawyer for the fee, Kendrick Douglas, learn an e-mail aloud from Farrow to Doucet.

“Had you taken the month I had offered, I would’ve been able to bring someone in temporarily so we would not have been so shorthanded,” the e-mail stated. “I was waiting to hear from you last week regarding your medical condition.”

Doucet stated she didn’t inform Farrow of all the things she was going by “because some things are left confidential” however that she was updating her boss on her return-to-work timeframe.

Farrow was conscious of the being pregnant termination. But on two events, Doucet requested for an extension on her return to work the night prior.

“You did not give me any notice and now I am scrambling,” one other e-mail from Farrow, which was learn aloud, stated.

Employer testimony

On Tuesday, the inquiry heard from Farrow herself.

Farrow stated it obtained to the purpose the place Doucet was taking day off with out authorization, and that she had used all her trip time and sick time.

“I looked at the medical leave that she had had, which addressed the fact that she had to have a procedure to terminate her pregnancy, that she had suffered complications from that termination, and she had been given additional time off to address those issues,” Farrow stated.

After being off for 3 weeks, Farrow reviewed all choices, together with bereavement depart, although on the time, being pregnant loss didn’t qualify for bereavement depart, she stated.

She turned emotional when she described having a number of miscarriages herself, and that she sympathized with Doucet.

But Farrow stated Doucet had missed three weeks at that time, and the business was seeing ripple results of her absence.

Doucet stated her psychological well being wasn’t predictable and was “week by week.”

“Unfortunately, at the very last minute, I had to go to my doctor the day before I was supposed to return to work because that’s just how it went,” she testified.

Other considerations raised

Two different points have been raised, together with a number of instances when Doucet didn’t receives a commission very first thing within the morning on payday.

That had an impression on a few of her invoice funds so she voiced concern every time, which finally started to frustrate Farrow as a result of she by no means missed a payday.

“I had addressed it with her,” Farrow stated. She instructed Doucet “[the money] will always be in your bank account on payday.”

The inquiry additionally heard Doucet had an ongoing situation together with her working relationship with Morgan Hicks, one other lawyer who has since change into a accomplice on the agency. Hicks testified Tuesday that Doucet would typically not full the work she was assigned.

Doucet was additionally requested to take away a video she posted on her Facebook web page involving her confronting somebody who had left a baby in a automobile. Doucet was requested to delete it as a result of Farrow was “a little shocked and a little distressed” over considerations that the video would replicate on the agency. She deleted the video after being requested.

The third pay situation got here to gentle three days after addressing the social media posting, Farrow testified.

“It was back-to-back issues that I was having with her,” Farrow stated.

When requested, Farrow confirmed she was terminated on account of ongoing points and her incapability to return to work after her medical depart.

Farrow stated it was her understanding that Doucet’s medical points have been resolved as a result of Doucet’s May 5 e-mail made no point out “of any further medical issues that she was having.”

The inquiry

Farrow, who attended the listening to as a respondent alongside together with her lawyer, Andrea MacNevin, declined an interview request made by Global News Monday.

The inquiry resumes Wednesday when Doucet can have the prospect to cross-examine Farrow.

After that, closing submissions can be made both orally or by way of written statements, and the board chair will possible take a while earlier than figuring out if the Human Rights Act was breached.