Canada banned these cancer-causing chemicals. But they’re still found in kids toys – National | 24CA News
Cancer-causing chemical substances are lurking in family electronics and youngsters’s toys, regardless of being banned for greater than a decade in Canada, a examine out of the University of Toronto discovered.
The examine, revealed Tuesday in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, says chlorinated paraffins have been discovered in additional than 87 per cent of examined family merchandise, which ranged from child rattles, toy vehicles, hand cleaning soap and headphones.
Read extra:
Cancer-linked chemical substances present in child blankets, bibs bought in Canada: report
“We found quite high concentrations of these compounds in toys meant for children and toddlers, in particular, teething toys,” stated Steven Kutarna, the examine’s lead creator and PhD candidate in Analytical Environmental Chemistry on the University of Toronto.
Another “surprising” product that was discovered to include one of many highest concentrations of chlorinated paraffins was earbud wires, he stated.
Canada banned the manufacturing, sale, use and import of chlorinated paraffins in 2013, below the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), because the chemical substances have been discovered to be harmful.
The short-chain chlorinated paraffin (SCCP) toxin isn’t solely a priority for the atmosphere, in accordance with Health Canada it’s a “potential concern” for human well being as “it was found to cause cancer in some experiments with laboratory animals.”
In an electronic mail to Global News on Tuesday, Health Canada stated it’s reviewing the U of T examine “and will take appropriate actions, as required, to further protect the health of Canadians from potential effects associated with SCCPs.”
What are chlorinated paraffins?
All chlorinated paraffins are categorized as “toxic” chemical substances below the CEPA.
They are usually utilized in metalworking fluids, paints, sealants, rubber and flame retardants in plastics, defined Karl Jobst, assistant professor within the Department of Chemistry at Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador.
They are utilized in on a regular basis home items as nicely, primarily for his or her flame-retardant properties.
However, due to environmental and human hurt introduced on by chlorinated paraffins, there are a number of different options to the chemical, he added.
“Why we’re still seeing them in high concentrations is a little bit of a mystery to me,” Jobst stated.
Evidence of the chemical substances’ toxicity has been mounting over time. Studies have proven the chemical substances can accumulate in human breast milk, can kill small aquatic creatures and have been proven to have endocrine-disrupting properties.
The chemical substances have been banned in Canada since 2013, and in 2017, SCCPs have been listed for elimination below the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, which Canada is a part of.
Although there aren’t any human research on their results, SCCPs could cause most cancers in laboratory rats and mice, particularly damaging the liver, thyroid and kidney. The International Agency for Research on Cancer acknowledges the chemical as a attainable carcinogen in people.
“One of the most concerning properties of these compounds is their persistence and their potential to bioaccumulate,” Jobst stated. “It’s not like you’re exposed to this once and then it goes away. These chemicals don’t degrade readily in the environment.”
Once an individual has consumed this chemical, both by means of inhalation of mud or hand-to-mouth contact with electronics, they’ll stay within the blood for a few years, inflicting dangerous results over time, he added.
Chemical present in child chew toys
The researchers of the examine checked out 96 indoor merchandise together with electrical gadgets, toys, private care merchandise and indoor furnishings. The merchandise have been both bought in Toronto or collected from properties within the metropolis. All objects have been newly bought in 2019 or at the least one yr after the 2013 ban on SCCPs in Canada.
After analyzing the objects, the researchers detected SCCPs in 84 of all of the 96 samples.
Many merchandise, like pores and skin lotions and shampoos, solely had hint quantities, however others had monumental portions of the chemical, Kutarna stated.
“Especially in the electronics, we were finding them as high as one per cent by weight,” he stated. “And one per cent is an absolutely enormous amount. It should not even be close that high.”
Read extra:
Toxic chemical substances in interval underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit
In phrases of the toys that have been examined, Kutrana stated a majority of them have been purchased at Dollarama and the researchers discovered SCCPs in a lot of the merchandise.
The highest concentrations of SCCPs have been detected in a foam toy.
“It was just a little squeeze toy … one of the ones just like a little red ball with a face on it,” he defined.
The chemical was additionally detected in toy packaging at comparatively excessive concentrations.
He added that though lots of the toys have been purchased at Dollarama, the merchandise have been imported from international locations like China and Taiwan, so it wouldn’t be stunning if different shops had comparable chemical substances of their merchandise.
Read extra:
Over 1 / 4 of things bought at Canada’s greenback shops have poisonous chemical substances: report
“Product compliance is Dollarama’s utmost priority, and we have strict processes and controls in place to monitor product safety and quality,” a Dollorama spokesperson stated in an emailed assertion to Global News when requested concerning the examine’s findings.
“We adhere to, and are held to, the very same standards as all other Canadian retailers, as are our products, many of which come from the very same sources as those sold by other major national retailers.”
The firm added that it’s “focused on increasing testing” to assist eliminate sure chemical substances in its plastic merchandise, resembling short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Other merchandise that had excessive quantities of the chemical in them included the outer plastic sheath of a pc wire and the outer plastic coating of an earphone wire.
After analyzing these merchandise, the researchers discovered the concentrations of chlorinated paraffins within the objects have been 1,000 occasions increased than these SCCPs measured in Canadian indoor mud, “suggesting that they could be important indoor sources,” the examine famous.
“This type of usage, particularly in headphone cables, provides opportunities for human exposure directly through hand contact with the cables,” the examine added.
Using flame retardant chemical substances, like chlorinated paraffins, in electrical wirings “makes sense,” Jobst stated. However, he stated he was “quite surprised” on the concentrations present in youngsters’s toys.
How are banned SCCPs nonetheless round?
Although chlorinated paraffins are unlawful in Canada, Kutrana stated it may be a technical problem to detect them, which is why they nonetheless present up in home items.
The downside, he believes, could lie with the availability chain.
“It may be that the manufacturers that are making the toys are getting their plastic from someone else that is including them in the mixture,” he stated.
“The companies that are actually putting the toys on shelves aren’t able to trace all the way back to where the original source of the plastic came from.”
A 2011 examine performed for Environment Canada concluded that there aren’t any imports of merchandise containing SCCPs from the United States or Europe, in accordance with the CEPA.
Read extra:
UBC engineers discover everlasting resolution for eradicating ‘forever chemicals’ from ingesting water
CEPA additionally stated that, whereas merchandise containing the chemical could also be imported from different areas of the world, none of those imports has been reported to Environment Canada.
“As a result, imports from these regions are expected to be small. Therefore, imports of products containing these substances are expected to be negligible under the status quo,” CEPA states.
While Canada has legislative controls in place, the presence of chlorinated paraffins in merchandise clearly reveals the problem of guaranteeing compliance, which requires ongoing product testing adopted by punitive motion, the researchers of the examine concluded.
Although there could also be technical challenges in place when testing for chlorinated paraffins, Kutrana hopes expertise for detecting these chemical substances improves and that there’s extra regulation for the federal government aspect.