B.C. court certifies period tracker app privacy class-action suit | 24CA News
A British Columbia Supreme Court decide says a class-action lawsuit can transfer ahead over alleged privateness breaches towards an organization that made an app to trace customers’ menstrual and fertility cycles.
The ruling revealed on-line Friday says the motion towards Flo Health Inc. alleges the corporate shared customers’ extremely private well being info with third-parties, together with Facebook, Google and different corporations.
The ruling says the corporate’s Flo Health & Period Tracker app is out there in additional than 100 international locations with thousands and thousands of customers around the globe, aiding girls by monitoring “all phases of their reproductive cycle.”
The resolution that certifies the class-action says it could cowl multiple million customers, who added private details about their menstrual cycles, and different knowledge together with their bodily features and when and the way typically they’d sexual activity.
The proposed motion covers greater than one million Canadians who used the app between June 2016 and February 2019, excluding these in Quebec, the place a separate class-action lawsuit was already licensed in November 2022.
The lawsuit alleges that Flo Health misused customers’ private info “for its own financial gain,” claiming breach of privateness, breach of confidence and “intrusion upon seclusion.”
The lawsuit was spurred by a U.S. Federal Trade Commission resolution the place Flo Health admitted it had despatched customers’ non-public details about their intervals and pregnancies to knowledge analytics divisions of Google, Facebook and two different companies.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Lauren Blake agreed to certify the class-action and appoint a consultant plaintiff, saying “the ever-increasing modern capacity to capture, store and retrieve information in our digital age has led to a corresponding need for the legal capacity to protect privacy. ”
“Privacy legislation has been recognized as being accorded quasi-constitutional status. In a similar manner, privacy torts — such as intrusion upon seclusion and breach of confidence — continue to evolve, and their proper scope in our modern world must continue to be addressed by our courts,” Blake’s ruling says.
© 2024 The Canadian Press
