Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Alberta Appeal Court dismisses coal company lawsuit alleging expropriation

Canada
Published 04.04.2024
Alberta Appeal Court dismisses coal company lawsuit alleging expropriation

EDMONTON — Alberta’s high courtroom is dismissing a coal firm’s request for compensation over authorities insurance policies to part out coal energy. 

Altius Royalty Corp. was asking for $190 million in compensation, arguing federal and provincial strikes to finish such era over local weather and well being issues was a kind of expropriation.

Altius, which owns the Genesee coal mine that feeds the Genesee energy plant, misplaced in Court of King’s Bench however took its case to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

In its choice launched at present, the Appeal Court says Altius argued the rules and agreements that led to the tip of coal-fired energy gave governments the good thing about decrease health-care and environmental prices. 

Because that profit might be assigned a greenback determine, Altius argued that qualifies it to compensated. 

But the judges dominated these advantages accrue to the general public, not the state. 

“Canada’s prediction of the health and environmental benefits resulting from the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions describes benefits to the public, not … an ‘advantage’ flowing to the state,” they wrote. 

They discovered neither Canada nor Alberta obtained any financial profit from Altius’ property. 

The courtroom discovered that permitting Altius’ attraction would kneecap the federal government’s capacity to manage.

“Extending the concept of ‘advantage’ as the appellant suggests could have a tremendous impact on the public purse and legislative decision making,” they write.

“It is questionable whether the application of the common law can, or should, intrude to this extent on decisions made by legislators in the public interest.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first printed April 4, 2024. 

The Canadian Press

<!– Photo: 2024040417048-660f16f34308953b812d1530jpeg.jpg, Caption: Alberta’s high courtroom is dismissing a coal firm’s request for compensation over authorities insurance policies which can be phasing out coal energy era within the province. Court of Appeal on the Edmonton Law Courts constructing, in Edmonton on June 28, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson

–>