Ottawa appeals court ruling that found use of Emergencies Act ‘unreasonable’ | 24CA News

Politics
Published 24.02.2024
Ottawa appeals court ruling that found use of Emergencies Act ‘unreasonable’  | 24CA News

Ottawa has filed to enchantment a Federal Court resolution that discovered its invocation of the Emergencies Act in response to the 2022 “Freedom Convoy” protests was unjustified.

The authorities is asking the Federal Court of Appeal to overturn a January resolution that discovered the federal government’s use of emergency regulation led to the infringement of constitutional rights.

The federal Liberals invoked emergency powers in response to 1000’s of protesters who entrenched themselves in downtown Ottawa for weeks and spinoff protests that blockaded border crossings.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and others argued in courtroom that Ottawa ushered within the emergency measures with out sound statutory grounds.


Get the most recent National news.

Sent to your electronic mail, day-after-day.

Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley’s resolution, which the Liberals instantly promised to enchantment, differed from the conclusion of the Public Order Emergency Commission.

Story continues under commercial


Click to play video: 'Trudeau invoking Emergencies Act during trucker convoy violated Charter, federal court rules'

Trudeau invoking Emergencies Act throughout trucker convoy violated Charter, federal courtroom guidelines


That inquiry discovered the federal government met the very excessive authorized normal for utilizing the regulation.

In the paperwork filed Thursday, the federal government outlined arguments together with that the Federal Court erred by reviewing the choice to invoke the act “with the benefit of hindsight” and based mostly on data not out there to the federal government in 2022.

The courtroom additionally made a mistake in substituting its personal opinion concerning the resolution the federal government ought to have made, it mentioned.

Instead, it mentioned, the courtroom ought to have checked out whether or not it was cheap for the federal government to “decide that it had reasonable grounds to believe” {that a} public order emergency existed and wanted to be handled by particular non permanent measures.

The courtroom was additionally flawed to determine the invocation of the Emergencies Act was a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the federal government argued.

&copy 2024 The Canadian Press