U.S. tells SCOTUS Purdue bankruptcy settlement for opioid lawsuits abuses law – National | 24CA News
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday requested the U.S. Supreme Court to cease Purdue Pharma from continuing with a chapter settlement that protects its Sackler household house owners from lawsuits.
An appeals court docket rejected a proposed delay earlier this week, ruling that Purdue might proceed with a chapter plan that was accepted in May. Purdue’s chapter plan would defend its house owners from opioid lawsuits in alternate for a US$6 billion contribution to the corporate’s broader chapter settlement.
The DOJ’s chapter watchdog, the Office of the U.S. Trustee, argued on Friday that Purdue shouldn’t be allowed to maneuver ahead with its restructuring earlier than the Supreme Court had an opportunity to weigh in on authorized protections for non-bankrupt entities, a difficulty that has divided chapter courts throughout the U.S.
The U.S. Trustee argued that Purdue’s settlement is an abuse of chapter protections meant for debtors in “financial distress,” not individuals just like the Sacklers, who withdrew US$11 billion from Purdue earlier than agreeing to contribute US$6 billion to its opioid settlement.
Approving Purdue’s chapter plan “would leave in place a roadmap for wealthy corporations and individuals to misuse the bankruptcy system,” the U.S Trustee argued.
Members of the Sackler household have denied wrongdoing however expressed remorse that the painkiller OxyContin “unexpectedly became part of an opioid crisis.” They stated in May that the chapter settlement would offer “substantial resources for people and communities in need.”
The Supreme Court set an Aug. 4 deadline for Purdue to reply.
Purdue has sought to make use of chapter to resolve 1000’s of lawsuits, many filed by state and native governments, alleging that OxyContin helped kickstart an opioid epidemic that induced greater than 500,000 U.S. overdose deaths over twenty years.
Purdue couldn’t instantly be reached for remark. The Connecticut-based firm beforehand argued that the DOJ’s proposed delay would stop Purdue from sending billions of {dollars} to U.S. states and particular person victims of the opioid disaster.
The lawsuits in opposition to Purdue and the Sacklers allege that the drugmaker misled docs about how addictive OxyContin was, inflicting many sufferers to turn into hooked on opioids.
Similar lawsuits associated to the U.S. opioid disaster have resulted in additional than $50 billion in settlements with producers, drug distributors and pharmacy chains.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis)
