3M reaches US$10.3B settlement over ‘forever chemicals’ contamination of water systems – National | 24CA News
Chemical producer 3M Co. can pay at the very least US$10.3 billion to settle lawsuits over contamination of many U.S. public ingesting water techniques with doubtlessly dangerous compounds utilized in firefighting foam and a number of client merchandise, the corporate stated Thursday.
The deal would compensate water suppliers for air pollution with per- and polyfluorinated substances, identified collectively as PFAS — a broad class of chemical compounds utilized in nonstick, water- and grease-resistant merchandise reminiscent of clothes and cookware.
Described as “forever chemicals” as a result of they don’t degrade naturally within the surroundings, PFAS have been linked to quite a lot of well being issues, together with liver and immune-system injury and a few cancers.
The compounds have been detected at various ranges in ingesting water across the nation. The Environmental Protection Agency in March proposed strict limits on two widespread varieties, PFOA and PFOS, and stated it wished to control 4 others. Water suppliers could be chargeable for monitoring their techniques for the chemical compounds.
The settlement would settle a case that was scheduled for trial earlier this month involving a declare by Stuart, Florida, one in every of about 300 communities which have filed related fits towards firms that produced firefighting foam or the PFAS it contained.
3M chairman Mike Roman stated the deal was “an important step forward” that builds on the corporate’s choice in 2020 to section out PFOA and PFOS and its investments in “state-of-the-art water filtration technology in our chemical manufacturing operations.” The firm, based mostly in St. Paul, Minnesota, will halt all PFAS manufacturing by the tip of 2025, he stated.
The settlement can be paid over 13 years and will attain as excessive as $12.5 billion, relying on what number of public water techniques detect PFAS throughout testing that EPA has required within the subsequent three years, stated Dallas-based lawyer Scott Summy, one of many lead attorneys for these suing 3M and different producers.
The cost will assist cowl prices of filtering PFAS from techniques the place it’s been detected and testing others, he stated.
“The result is that millions of Americans will have healthier lives without PFAS in their drinking water,” Summy stated.
Earlier this month, three different firms — DuPont de Nemours Inc. and spinoffs Chemours Co. and Corteva Inc. — reached a US$1.18 billion deal to resolve PFAS complaints by about 300 ingesting water suppliers. A lot of states, airports, firefighter coaching services and personal effectively homeowners even have sued.
The circumstances are pending in U.S. District Court in Charleston, South Carolina, the place Judge Richard Gergel is overseeing hundreds of complaints alleging PFAS damages. A trial of a grievance by the town of Stuart, Florida, had been scheduled to start this month however was delayed to permit time for extra settlement negotiations.
Most of the lawsuits have stemmed from firefighter coaching workout routines at airports, army bases and different websites across the U.S. that repeatedly used foams laced with excessive concentrations of PFAS, Summy stated.
The 3M settlement is topic to court docket approval, he stated.
3M’s web site says the corporate helped the U.S. Navy develop foams containing PFAS chemical compounds within the Nineteen Sixties.
“This was an important and life-saving tool that helped combat dangerous fires, like those caused by jet fuel,” the corporate stated.
3M stated its participation within the settlement “is not an admission of liability” and stated if it was rejected in court docket, “3M is prepared to continue to defend itself.”
The price of cleaning PFAS from U.S. water techniques ultimately might go a lot greater than the sums agreed to within the settlements, Summy acknowledged.
“I’m not sure anyone knows what that ultimate number will be,” he stated. “But I do think this is going to make a huge dent in that cost … and you don’t have to litigate for the next decade or longer.”
© 2023 The Canadian Press
