Court orders City of Vancouver to reconsider rejected tower at 105 Keefer St. | 24CA News

A controversial Chinatown condominium improvement rejected by the City of Vancouver greater than 5 years in the past could have one other shot at life.

Vancouver’s Development Permit Board voted down the proposed 111-unit improvement at 105 Keefer St. in November 2017 — the fifth and remaining time the proposal didn’t win approval.

But on Friday, a B.C. Supreme Court choose ordered the board to take one other have a look at the proposal.

In the ruling, posted Monday, Justice Jan Brongers dismissed developer Beedie Holdings Ltd.’s arguments that it had been denied procedural equity and that the allow board lacked the authority to scuttle the undertaking.

But she discovered the board’s choice was however “substantively unreasonable” as a result of the board had failed to offer enough causes for its choice.

In its petition for judicial evaluate, Beedie argued that there had not been a single current case through which the Development Permit Board had outright refused a allow. Instead, the board’s customary follow was to approve functions, topic to situations.

The developer argued that accordingly, the board was obligated to elucidate why it had departed from this longstanding follow, and that because it hadn’t, its choice was unreasonable.

1:47
City of Vancouver strikes down Chinatown improvement

The metropolis denied there had been any departure from previous follow, and that the board had offered an in depth sufficient clarification for its choice to satisfy its authorized necessities.

The ruling notes Beedie offered an affidavit exhibiting that of 111 allow functions thought of between 2012 and 2017, Beedie’s was the one one which was rejected outright. Other functions, had been permitted, although with situations that needed to be glad earlier than the allow was granted.

Brongers concluded that the board’s Nov. 6, 2017, choice to reject the DP Application with out indicating what situations Beedie would have wanted to acquire the board’s approval was “a departure from past practice that violated Beedie’s legitimate expectations.”

“In these circumstances, the Board had a burden to explain and justify this departure in its reasons,” Brongers dominated.

“However, I have searched in vain for such a justificatory explanation in the transcript of the Board members’ remarks made at the November 6, 2017 meeting, and in the November 16, 2017 letter to Beedie that confirmed the denial of the DP Application. In the absence of such an explanation, I find that the Board’s decision was unreasonable.”

2:30
Chinatown neighborhood condominium opposition

Bronger’s ruling ordered the Development Permit Board to rethink Beedie’s software, and additional ordered the board to evaluate whether or not the undertaking warrants approval, approval with situations, or outright refusal.

If the board had been to refuse the undertaking, she dominated, it should present “detailed and sufficient reasons to transparently explain why such a refusal is justified.”

Beedie initially purchased the land in 2013 for $16.2 million, however the undertaking confronted neighborhood opposition from the get-go.

Hundreds of audio system descended on public hearings, and opponents argued the undertaking was too tall, the items had been too costly, and that the event would change the feel and appear of the neighbourhood.

Between 2014 and the ultimate Development Permit Board vote in 2017, Bedie submitted 4 failed rezoning functions for the mixed-use tower undertaking 4 different instances.

In June 2017, council voted in opposition to a model of the undertaking that included a 12-storey tower with about two dozen items put aside for low-income seniors.

The model rejected that November was shriveled to 9 from 12 storeys, that means Beedie solely wanted a improvement allow, and never a rezoning.

The remaining rejected proposal additionally eliminated a proposed 25 items of social housing.

&copy 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.