Canada’s online streaming act could discriminate against American companies: U.S. embassy – National | 24CA News

The United States Embassy in Ottawa says it has considerations that the federal Liberals’ controversial on-line streaming act may discriminate towards American corporations.

In an announcement to The Canadian Press, an embassy spokeswoman mentioned U.S. officers are holding consultations with companies about how Bill C-11 may have an effect on their operations.

“We have … concerns it could impact digital streaming services and discriminate against U.S. businesses,” Molly Sanchez Crowe mentioned within the assertion.

The invoice goals to replace Canada’s broadcasting legislation so it displays the arrival of on-line streaming platforms similar to YouTube, Spotify and Netflix. If the invoice passes, such platforms can be required to contribute to the creation of Canadian content material and make it accessible to customers in Canada _ or face steep penalties.

The proposed legislation has come beneath intense scrutiny amid accusations from corporations and critics who mentioned it left an excessive amount of room for presidency management over user-generated content material and social-media algorithms.

The chair of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, which might be given new enforcement powers beneath the invoice, threw water on these considerations throughout a Senate committee listening to final month, although some lawmakers mentioned they have been nonetheless involved about vagueness within the invoice’s wording.

YouTube, which is owned by Google, has mentioned it’s not involved about being regulated additional. But it has maintained that the invoice would interact in synthetic promotion of sure content material and provides the federal government management over what customers see.

2:09
Trudeau doesn’t decide to releasing coverage directive to CRTC on Online Streaming Act

Under the United States-Canada-Mexico free-trade settlement, or USMCA, a rustic can problem a legislation when it feels it’s being discriminated towards.

U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai has beforehand expressed concern concerning the proposed legislation, however has not mentioned whether or not her nation would launch a commerce dispute.

International Trade Minister Mary Ng has insisted that the net streaming act in is line with Canada’s commerce obligations.

Marc Froese, a political science professor at Burman University in Alberta, mentioned it’s potential a dispute might be launched towards Canada.

“Is it inevitable? No,” he mentioned in an interview Tuesday.

He pointed to a cross-border dispute Canada confronted 25 years in the past over “split-run” magazines, or American magazines that have been bought in Canada with the identical content material however with Canadian promoting. The share of Canadian advertisements they may embody had already been strictly restricted because the ’60s, and in 1994, the federal government added a hefty excise tax to the equation.

Ottawa noticed the coverage as a solution to stop cultural swamping by the Americans, Froese mentioned.

5:43
How Bill C-11 may change streaming companies in Canada

But the U.S. disputed the coverage by way of the World Trade Organization and threatened retaliation beneath the then-North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA.

“We played hardball. The Americans sued us,” Froese mentioned. “And we lost.”

Jean Chretien’s Liberal authorities was compelled to again down, although some restrictions on imported magazines remained. Since then, Froese mentioned Canada has realized so much about commerce disputes and cultural exemptions, and it has turn out to be a number one person of dispute decision mechanisms on the worldwide stage.

“We’re not a babe in the woods when it comes to dealing with litigation. Canadians get afraid of that: ‘The Americans might sue us. They won’t like what we’re doing.’ Yeah, so what?” Froese mentioned.

Even so, the up to date broadcasting guidelines might be protected against commerce violations by cultural exemptions written into commerce agreements, he mentioned.

Toronto-based commerce lawyer Lawrence Herman, of Herman & Associates, mentioned he doesn’t suppose the invoice will face many extra hurdles.

“The Canadian government will do whatever is necessary to make sure that these measures are implemented in a perfectly legitimate way,” Herman mentioned. “To avoid any suggestion that our trade commitments are not right.”

The invoice handed within the House of Commons final June and is awaiting a ultimate vote within the Senate.

&copy 2023 The Canadian Press